![](https://media.sermonaudio.com/images/web/images/tx.gif)
![](https://media.sermonaudio.com/images/web/images/menushadowbottom.PNG)
|
|
USER COMMENTS BY B. MCCAUSLAND |
|
|
Page 1 | Page 25 · Found: 500 user comments posted recently. |
| ![](https://media.sermonaudio.com/images/web/images/btn_prev4.gif) |
|
|
4/22/2020 12:50 PM |
B. McCausland | | ![](https://media.sermonaudio.com/images/web/images/gray2.gif) | ![Find all comments by B. McCausland](https://media.sermonaudio.com/images/web/images/magnifier.gif) |
|
Add new comment![](https://media.sermonaudio.com/images/web/images/arrow_dotted.gif) Reply to comment![](https://media.sermonaudio.com/images/web/images/arrow_dotted.gif) Report abuse
|
Nick wrote: 1. The Constitution is the supreme law of the land here in the United States. What is to be done when someone in governmental position breaks the law?2. Eric from NC wote The Bible says that we should honor God first. He should take precedence over man's judgement. It says, If possible, live peaceably with all men. It's not peaceable to shut down churches. It says, Forsake not the assembling of yourselves together. This is what the Bible says. The judges are wrong. Some Americans treat their constitution as if were the Bible itself.As good as it is to have legal guarantees in place for freedom of speech, association and worship as included in the text of the American constitution, such work as 'guidelines'. If emergencies suggest *temporal* adjustment for the sake of the immediate good of the country and fellow citizens, it is not a matter of breaking the law, or being unconstitutional, but of being sensible, and honouring temporal measures or instructions. When *'Congress'* makes permanent laws contradicting bible truth, that will be the time to sound the alarm. See the text, " *Congress shall make no law* respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; ..." |
|
|
4/22/2020 11:32 AM |
B. McCausland | | ![](https://media.sermonaudio.com/images/web/images/gray2.gif) | ![Find all comments by B. McCausland](https://media.sermonaudio.com/images/web/images/magnifier.gif) |
|
Add new comment![](https://media.sermonaudio.com/images/web/images/arrow_dotted.gif) Reply to comment![](https://media.sermonaudio.com/images/web/images/arrow_dotted.gif) Report abuse
|
John UK wrote: 1. There will always be those who have no intention of discussing in a friendly fashion.2. ... get to grips with what scripture teaches us. If that means jettisoning some things we have been brainwashed with, so be it. 3. Mike, the verb is stauroo (which has a line above the second o). The noun is stauro. In the KJV we have 'crucified' and 'cross', and that is what we have been fed with for centuries. But how will you translate these Greek words? 1. Thanks, John, however, 'friendly' discussion is only the 'cosmetic' side of the whole matter. The true issue is integrity of thought and reasoning which follows after valid patterns of logic, without guile, misrepresentation, wrong asumptions, or twisted presumptions. This shows in this passage by contrasting 'chaste' versus 'corrupted'"I am jealous over you with godly jealousy: ... that I may present you as a 'chaste' virgin to Christ. But I fear, lest by any means, as the serpent beguiled Eve through his subtilty, so your minds should be corrupted from the simplicity that is in Christ." 2. Sound 3. Impalled 4. Mike, the brutal execution by 'hanging' had not the comfort of any in mind. The hanging on a pole could include nailing stretched arms over the head or back. |
|
|
4/20/2020 5:23 PM |
B. McCausland | | ![](https://media.sermonaudio.com/images/web/images/gray2.gif) | ![Find all comments by B. McCausland](https://media.sermonaudio.com/images/web/images/magnifier.gif) |
|
Add new comment![](https://media.sermonaudio.com/images/web/images/arrow_dotted.gif) Reply to comment![](https://media.sermonaudio.com/images/web/images/arrow_dotted.gif) Report abuse
|
John UK wrote: Doc, in a game of football there are goal posts at each end of the pitch. Let us say that the goal is argument 1, and if you want to counter the argument, you have to kick the ball between the goal posts. But you realise that you have already lost the argument, and you cannot counter it, so there is only one thing left to do. You create a false argument (argument 2), which you know you can counter successfully, which means that you have to move the goal posts. It's a bit like creating a strawman, which no-one is arguing for. Thusly, it is dishonest, and does not make for good, Christian discussion. Common practice here. Good you took the time to spell it out as it is. After submitting strong evidence for a case, usually the straw men turn up in all sorts of shapes or colours as surviving kits for those resisting truth, which reality convince us that not all deserve to hear or to know facts, as not only these are dismembered apart but then follow after to shame the messenger. As you point out, " Thusly, it is dishonest" and it "does not make for good, Christian discussion" to say the least. |
|
|
4/19/2020 7:21 PM |
B. McCausland | | ![](https://media.sermonaudio.com/images/web/images/gray2.gif) | ![Find all comments by B. McCausland](https://media.sermonaudio.com/images/web/images/magnifier.gif) |
|
Add new comment![](https://media.sermonaudio.com/images/web/images/arrow_dotted.gif) Reply to comment![](https://media.sermonaudio.com/images/web/images/arrow_dotted.gif) Report abuse
|
Dr. Tim wrote: “ We owe all to Jesus crucified. What is your life, my brethren, but the cross? Whence comes the bread of your soul but from the cross? What is your joy but the cross? What is your delight, what is your heaven, but the Blessed One, once crucified for you, who ever lives to make intercession for you?” Silly Spurgeon, getting his theology from YouTube! Sir, sarcasm apart, what Bible believers mean by the term 'the cross', for lack of another more precise term nominating Jesus' work of redemption, is not exactly what historical christiandom has taken this term for during many centuries of apostasy. As the names for the children of God have varied through the passing of time, from disciples, believers, saints, Christians, born again, etc..., so his accomplishment under the predetermined Council of God could be termed by different terms as his Work, his redemption, his betrayal, his sufferings, his sacrifice, his impalement, the giving of himself, his lifting up, or his eternal offering unto God by the Spirit of truth. Any of this would entirely describe what Spurgeon had in mind when using 'the cross' , which franckly is a convenient term in the evangelical jargon we know, though to the unsaved means nothing. |
|
|
4/19/2020 4:44 PM |
B. McCausland | | ![](https://media.sermonaudio.com/images/web/images/gray2.gif) | ![Find all comments by B. McCausland](https://media.sermonaudio.com/images/web/images/magnifier.gif) |
|
Add new comment![](https://media.sermonaudio.com/images/web/images/arrow_dotted.gif) Reply to comment![](https://media.sermonaudio.com/images/web/images/arrow_dotted.gif) Report abuse
|
Surely the issues you mention John, are worthy of consideration and even of further investigation.True, there are many passages which content runs over our heads as water runs the back of a duck. Here a some considering the theme of piercing. Take care "... the assembly of the wicked have inclosed me: they pierced my hands and my feet." "I will pour upon the house of David, and upon the inhabitants of Jerusalem, the spirit of grace and of supplications: and they shall look upon me whom they have pierced, and they shall mourn for him, as one mourns for his only son, and shall be in bitterness for him, as one that is in bitterness for his firstborn." "But one of the soldiers with a spear pierced his side, ... that the scripture should be fulfilled ... They shall look on him whom they pierced." "Behold, he comes with clouds; and every eye shall see him, and they also which pierced him: and all kindreds of the earth shall wail because of him" |
|
|
4/19/2020 1:57 PM |
B. McCausland | | ![](https://media.sermonaudio.com/images/web/images/gray2.gif) | ![Find all comments by B. McCausland](https://media.sermonaudio.com/images/web/images/magnifier.gif) |
|
Add new comment![](https://media.sermonaudio.com/images/web/images/arrow_dotted.gif) Reply to comment![](https://media.sermonaudio.com/images/web/images/arrow_dotted.gif) Report abuse
|
John, it is interesting how the disciples linked Christ's execution to the OT death penalty by hanging on a tree.For instance, "The God of our fathers raised up Jesus, whom ye slew and hanged on a tree." Or "Who his own self bare our sins in his own body on the tree" Saying that however, when the rendering of 'crucified' appears in modern translations, the stauros word behind this term points to the sense of impaling, say hanging a human by piercing, not necessarily by ropes. Prisoners of war or people charged with treason were executed by hanging on a tree or pole in old times. We can see in Scriptures divers cases as that, for instance the baker in Joseph's dungeon. From wikipedia, Impaling as used in Babylonia and the Neo-Assyrian Empire as early as the 18th century BC. meant the torture or killing by penetration of a human by a piercing object such as a stake, pole, spear, or hook, often by the complete or partial perforation of the torso. With all the above in mind, we might gather that Christ's death gets a deeper theological sense than the mere RC melodramatic scene of a crucifixion. *** A caution about quoting early writings, some sadly resort to as proof for a discussion. They often come subject to current bias in translation and editing. |
|
|
4/19/2020 12:46 PM |
B. McCausland | | ![](https://media.sermonaudio.com/images/web/images/gray2.gif) | ![Find all comments by B. McCausland](https://media.sermonaudio.com/images/web/images/magnifier.gif) |
|
Add new comment![](https://media.sermonaudio.com/images/web/images/arrow_dotted.gif) Reply to comment![](https://media.sermonaudio.com/images/web/images/arrow_dotted.gif) Report abuse
|
Adriel wrote: The reason why the cross has become a "graven image" is because of its association with the Death of Christ the Son of God.Iconography is ... another big idolatrous practice of the papists. This too has been censured by true Christians in history. ... the cross is a graven image in the religious idolatry of many in churches across the world. Just as icons ... Is. 44:9 They that make a graven image are all of them vanity ... that is profitable for nothing? John UK wrote The stauros is the real thing; the cross is an invention of man. Thank you, Adriel, yours is a sound reformed approach.The magical Egyptian sign for life made of a cross with a loop on top might be an antecendent of the 'Christian cross'. The sign of the cross became through history a "graven image" of the apostate church, infiltrating the global church and present undiscerning evangelical settings via the Vulgate translation which rendered stauros as crux, crucem or crucis, -all different declensions of the word cross in Latin which alters the word endings to show grammatical case, number and gender- instead of rendering an specific term for stauros. From there subtly and sadly it made its way into modern English translations from Tyndale. |
|
|
4/18/2020 6:47 AM |
B. McCausland | | ![](https://media.sermonaudio.com/images/web/images/gray2.gif) | ![Find all comments by B. McCausland](https://media.sermonaudio.com/images/web/images/magnifier.gif) |
|
Add new comment![](https://media.sermonaudio.com/images/web/images/arrow_dotted.gif) Reply to comment![](https://media.sermonaudio.com/images/web/images/arrow_dotted.gif) Report abuse
|
See where you come from, John, about the cult to the sign or emblem of the cross via RC folklore.However, every time the word crucified, or even cross, appears in NT the corresponding Greek term is stauros, a pole, and the idea is to impale, hung up, or to be 'lifted up' as mentioned in John 3 for instance, when alluding to the type of the serpent being lifted up on the pole in the desert. Prophetically, we read 'curse upon any one hanging on a tree', say a pole, or to be impaled to death by that way. As in Deuteronomy, "And if a man have committed a sin worthy of death, and he be to be put to death, and thou hang him on a tree" Yet, Psalm 22:16 and the post resurrection incident with Thomas points to the piercing of hands and feet. The applied theology of the 'cross' is the dying to self portrayed in passages as this, "And he that takes not his cross, (stauros) and follows after me, is not worthy of me" |
|
|
|
|
|
![](https://media.sermonaudio.com/images/web/images/tx.gif)
|
![](https://media.sermonaudio.com/images/web/images/tx.gif)
|