You certainly do speak from experience, but I am afraid you also speak from great ignorance. Are you really putting the words of a 16th century translation over and above the GK text? (from which it was translated)

If so, as I said earlier this is not only superstition but idolatry!

I have shown very clearly, clearly enough for any lay person to understand, that there are errors in the kjv, even deviations from the TR itself. If you continue to live in the dark, and take pride in such ignorance, then I am afraid you simply are unteachable.

Please sermon audio users, do not fall into this Romish superstition, the arguments used to defend kjvo are just like the traditional papist argument for the Vulgate.

Turn away from this error, use the kjv if you like, but do not pass the traditions of men off for the commandments of God.

Having Just seen nowchildren's comment, I am rebuked and humbled, this will be my last post, Good night!

What you have written has absolutely nothing to do with the fact that there are errors in the kjv, as I said NO GK MSS!

Also there were also Heretics in all parts of the 'Christian World' in fact one of the greatest defenders of the Christian faith in the earliest centuries was Athanasius can I ask you where was he from?

There is simply no evidence that the earliest manuscripts we have were tampered with by Heretics, the fact that they agree 100% doctrinally (No variant changes any point of doctrine) with other MMS found elsewhere, would suggest that any such claims are unfounded.

With regards Rev 17:8 not one single GK MSS (including those used for the TR!) has the words and yet is, NOT ONE!

This is clearly an error in transmission, now for you to suggest that we should cleave to 'and yet it is' just because it is in the kjv, is superstition of the worst kind.

You show by this you have more regard for a 17th cent translation than you do for God Himself.

To keep throwing up W&H is simply disengenous, this mistake clearly happened 200yrs before they were born.

NOT ONE MSS!

Nothing to do with 'newly found' MSS the phrase is missing from every MSS, do you get that?

Again this includes the MSS used by Tyndale and the like.

Please leave off this idolatry and superstition. Cleaving to the kjv does not make you anymore holy, or reverent, or reformed. I know many think using it and defending it makes them, an elite breed of super Christians, but surely God hates that attitude.

If you prefer the kjv fine use it, but do not force this translation on anyone else it clearly contains errors, and only those who are willfully deceived would try to deny this!

For ye have brought hither these men, which are neither robbers of churches, nor yet blasphemers of your goddess.

The reason for my attitude is not that I dislike the kjv or its translators, I do however dislike, superstition and Idolatry. Many who would impose the kjv upon everyone, are either ignorant of the facts or are knowingly trying to mislead people. Therefore as a servant of Christ who was truth incarnate, it is incumbent upon me to confront and expose such error. Again my beef is not with the kjv or its translators, but the dictators and tyrants who try to uni-formally impose it upon God's church.

Regards

Soli Deo Gloria!

Let us hold fast the profession of our faith without wavering; (for he is faithful that promised)

The phrase “profession of our faith” should be “profession of our hope.” Everyone concedes that the actual Greek word is hope (ἐλπίς, not faith πίστις hope is found in all manuscripts and all editions of the TR. Hope and faith are two entirely different words, so one cannot sincerely argue that the translators simply decided on “faith” as the correct translation at this point. Besides, the Greek word for hope ἐλπίς is used 52 others times in the NT and in every case the translators of the kjv rendered it “hope,” not “faith.” How this error slipped past the translators is unclear; nevertheless, it is an indisputable error in the kjv.

I do not use the NIV (Although it is a very good version)my preferred version is the ESV.

Neil I have proven modern translations to be better, as they do not make the mistakes mentioned in the kjv!

'The record for whose inspiration we contend is the original record—the autographs or parchments of Moses, David, Daniel, Matthew, Paul or Peter, as the case may be, and not any particular translation or translations of them whatever. There is no translation absolutely without error, nor could there be, considering the infirmities of human copyists, unless God were pleased to perform a perpetual miracle to secure it.'

The comparison is being made with all extant GK MSS!

It may surprise you to know that they have been around 1000yrs before the much maligned W&H.

It may also surprise you to know that the kjv was an Anglican version.

The beast that thou sawest was, and is not; and shall ascend out of the bottomless pit, and go into perdition: and they that dwell on the earth shall wonder, whose names were not written in the book of life from the foundation of the world, when they behold the beast that was, and is not, and yet is.

Another textual error is found in Acts 9:6, where the kjv reads:

And he trembling and astonished said, Lord, what wilt thou have me to do? And the Lord said unto him, Arise, and go into the city, and it shall be told thee what thou must do.

1611 kjv reads 1 John 5:12 'he that hath not the Son, hath not life'

Modern kjv reads 'he that hath not the Son of God hath not life'

1611 kjv reads 1 Tim 1:4 'rather than edifying'

modern kjv reads 'rather than godly edifying'

There are many more variants between 1611 and the modern kjv my question is which one is the true rendering of the GK text?

Even present editions of the kjv still contain what is apparently an original printing error that was never corrected. In Matthew 23:24 the kjv reads:

Ye blind guides, which strain at a gnat, and swallow a camel.

And I heard the angel of the waters say, Thou art righteous, O Lord, which art, and wast, and shalt be, because thou hast judged thus.

The information you have provided is simply the opposite of what is really happening in the world today. Can you see beyond your own front gate?

80million Christians in China

More Presbyterians in South Korea than in USA!

Why do you continue to trot this nonsense out?

I have had enough of this ignorance, please stop wasting you life with this tomfoolery!