|
|
USER COMMENTS BY JUST WONDERING |
|
|
Page 1 | Page 2 · Found: 113 user comments posted recently. |
| | | |
|
|
2/2/16 10:15 PM |
just wondering | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
GSMontana wrote: sc may be referring to the women on the show being immodest. I've never watched it since I don't watch tv (and wouldn't watch redneck reality shows even if I did), but I have seen pictures of the family on a book and remember one of the women being immodest. got it, thanks, sc is saying If ladybug goes to a family reunion and there are relatives and friends there who don't share her view of modest apparel and the she is having a discussion of the perverseness of the sodomite movement, the fact that she is willingly at that gathering silences her witness. Jesus was teaching moral perfection before you could speak out against sin, not humility and self-examination. Got it |
|
|
2/2/16 8:56 PM |
just wondering | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
Ladybug wrote: The Robertsons believe in baptismal regeneration. This is interesting as well- http://pulpitandpen.org/2013/08/16/why-christianity-doesnt-need-duck-dynasty-or-other-celebrities/ appreciate the link, thus it is good not to follow his doctrinal teachings. Probably he has other issues when you think of the entertainment business, still doesn't explain the sc comment about sexual immorality, especially when the thumbnail bio has him speaking against it. Just wondering |
|
|
2/2/16 7:24 PM |
just wondering | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
s c wrote: Some moral endorsement- like the kettle calling the pot black. Maybe Robertson should pull the beam out of his own eye when it comes to immorality so that he might see more clearly to deal with the speck in others. So many "Christians" who protest sodomy are steeped in sexual immorality themselves. sorry, not an endorsement of Mr. Robertson, but what are you talking about, he has what is describe as a rock solid marriage and has not been involved in any infidelity that I could find. |
|
|
1/14/15 12:46 PM |
just wondering | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
s c wrote: ...just the fruit of a nation that wants to do it their way. No surprise. We embrace lewdness,promiscuity,glamorize prostitution,wink at infidelity,cram porn/immoral pictures down the throats of all to see,encourage our little girls/young women to dress like whores,watch slutty television programs like nfl football and dancing with the stars and other "reality" shows and then we wonder why men are so uncommitted. so that makes it ok? Elbret from Belfast lamented the effects on the children. Tell me where you show any sympathy for those who are suffering. They got was coming to them, is that the attitude we should have? just wondering |
|
|
10/5/14 1:16 AM |
Just wondering | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
s c wrote: If wedding-related businesses hadn't already compromised in catering to the fornicators and adulterers, they may not be in the position of having to set boundaries now when it comes to the homosexuals. Soon, we may be asking the same question when it comes to the union of pedophiles, beast lovers and incestuous partners. Welcome to the land of the "free". So, are you saying. 1. business should only serve people they have checked out as living a godly lifestyle? 2. Are you saying businesses shouldn't have any boundaries because they served a person involved in sin? 3. Are you blaming the business for the actions of its customers? 4.Are you saying that only businesses with signs that say we don't serve fornicators and adulterers can also turn down homosexual wishes to honor their lifestyle? 5. Do you truly believe that homosexuals would not persecute these businesses had they done as you had said and not served fornicators and adulterers? 6.What is your understanding of first Corinthians 5:9,10? |
|
|
10/5/14 12:49 AM |
Just wondering | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
Lurker wrote: Not agreeing with your assertion that the prophecy speaks of ethnic Israel.. Ezekiel 37 (as does the passage from Isaiah you quoted) speaks of the tribes of Israel, so unless you want to assign tribes to the Israel of God, then you shouldn't pass over the assertion that it is ethnic Israel.Paul did not say that the time in which he lived was the fulfillment of Ezekiel 37 or even Isaiah 49. As stated previously, Ezekiel 37 speaks of a king, Israel had none, it speaks of Israel as being a people walking in the ways of God, not true of them in Christ's and Paul's day. Fulfilling one part of a passage from the O.T. in the N.T. is not necessarily the fulfilling of the entire text as you imply in your response. Observe Micah 5:2 which was quoted of Christ's birth in Bethlehem, at what point did He govern and rule Israel? Zechariah 13:7-9 speaks of judgment of fire and refinement on God's people, but verse 7 clearly refers to the crucifixion. Hosea 10 is a passage about the Assyrian judgment upon the ten northern tribes, a past event, but verse 8 is quoted by Jesus as a future event. (Luke 23:30) As noted before, the moon did not turn to blood or the sun into darkness on the day of Pentecost. |
|
|
10/4/14 4:50 PM |
Just wondering | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
Lurker wrote: ... So what, in particular, requires further explanation? the nation had no king after the exile into Babylon and Assyria, and at time of Christ they certainly could not have been said to have been cleansed of their sinful ways. They are said to be put back into the land and God would dwell with them and they would be his people. This is definitely the physical descendants of Israel. When do you see this as being fulfilled? |
|
|
10/4/14 2:58 PM |
Just wondering | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
Lurker wrote: This is getting interesting. If God brings about the salvation of Jews by their own freewill, their free will is not free. Or is it that the Jews who do believe of their own, un-manipulated by God, free will are real ethnic Jews and those who don't never were ethnic Jews? And then the question arises; what is the difference between the believing ethnic Jews and believing Gentiles? Will any of the unbelieving Jews inherit the promises? And what promise will the Christianized ethnic Jews receive? And what promise will Gentile Christians receive? Quite a quagmire you've bought into. and your explanation of Ezekiel 37? |
|
|
10/3/14 8:16 PM |
Just wondering | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
pennned wrote: Around 30 AD... Mark 13: 1-2 The disciples marveled at the temple, Jesus said, its so great? Its going to be destroyed. Mark 13:4 Disciples asked when temple would be destroyed. Mark 13:14 Jesus said per Daniel (9) just after abomination of desolation. Mark wrote the book around 50 AD [URL=http://https://www.blueletterbible.org/study/intros/mark.cfm]]]blueletterbible, when Mark written?[/URL] The Christians read the warnings. The Roman-Jewish war of 66-70 AD[URL=http://www.ecclesia.org/truth/mat04.html]]]ecclesia, abomination of desolation[/URL] 70 AD --- The temple was destroyed. In this way the Christians were warned ahead of time to what was about to take place. But a greater event is that the temple was destroyed, it was no longer needed. the curtain in half --the veil is gone, the holy of holies no longer just for priests. Christians are a royal priesthood, both Jew and Greek. are you saying that all the foretold events of Mark 13 happened in a 20 year period? |
|
|
6/23/14 10:15 AM |
Just wondering | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
Jim Lincoln wrote: ... Any government that says anything different is wrong. So, you are saying the current occupant of the White House and his polices are wrong and should not be supported? Are you saying that we should vote for people for office who oppose gay marriage and vote out those who do? Just wondering |
|
|
6/11/14 5:12 PM |
Just wondering | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
s c wrote: Knowledge of how they partook of the Lord's Supper helps... Still at a loss here, just trying to be on same page.I Corinthians 11:20 When ye come together therefore into one place, this is not to eat the Lord's supper (then he speaks of the agape feast you referenced, but Paul is clearly speaking of the way after the resurrection believer's practiced the Lord's Supper) (v23-26) 23 For I have received of the Lord that which also I delivered unto you, that the Lord Jesus the same night in which he was betrayed took bread: 24 And when he had given thanks, he brake it, and said, Take, eat: this is my body, which is broken for you: this do in remembrance of me. 25 After the same manner also he took the cup, when he had supped, saying, this cup is the new testament in my blood: this do ye, as oft as ye drink it, in remembrance of me. 26 For as often as ye eat this bread, and drink this cup, ye do shew the Lord's death till he come. The apostle Paul referenced the supper found in the gospels as the pattern for communion. You seem to be saying, no that was a Jewish custom or holiday not to be emulated. So, who is right, you or the apostle Paul? |
|
|
6/11/14 3:36 PM |
Just wondering | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
s c wrote: Instead of celebrating communion by partaking of wine, juice or bread/crackers which are symbolic and being unsure of which best represents it and to hat frequency, why don't Christians understand that every time we come together to meet and to glorify God, that we are celebrating communion in that we partake of Him (His Word) as in He is the Bread of Life and His Spirit (the new wine)? How does that line up with I Corinthians 11:20-34, Matthew 26:17-30, Mark 14:12-26, Luke 22:7-39 and John 13:1-17:26? |
|
|
4/2/14 3:09 PM |
Just wondering | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
Jim Lincoln wrote: ....In so far as prayer is concerned, the school is not a religious or home setting so perhaps, Matthew 6:6 "But you, when you pray, go into your inner room, and when you have shut your door, pray to your Father who is in secret, and your Father who sees in secret will repay you.---... So, when Jesus made the crowds of 5,000 and 4,000 to sit down for food, He should not have offered a prayer of thanksgiving, like this child was trying to do, because it was not a religious or home setting? |
|
|
|
Jump to Page : 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 |
| | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|